Blackview BV9800 Pro vs CAT S61 differences

Blackview BV9800 Pro vs CAT S61 differences and performance benchmark

Do you need any of these phones – Blackview BV9800 Pro vs CAT S61? Both companies made these phones in keeping particular customer demand in mindset. The phone is designed to endure even high pressure water jets which are common in many industries. There’s plenty of polycarbonate and rubber to absorb shock and protect the device from drops, and a metal frame to improve its overall structure. The front hosts three physical navigation keys, which are great for those – who wear gloves, for example – who want some proper feedback when pressing buttons. Which one is worth buying – Blackview BV9800 Pro vs CAT S61?

shop gadgets is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Raed more
Blackview BV9800 Pro vs CAT S61
Blackview BV9800 Pro vs CAT S61

At a glance what you should know – Blackview BV9800 Pro vs CAT S61?

  • 1.89% higher pixel density?
    432ppi vs 424ppi
  • 2.5% faster CPU speed?
    6 x 2GHz & 2 x 2.2GHz vs 4 x 2.2 & 4 x 1.8GHz
  • 4GB more RAM memory?
    8GBvs4GB
  • 18.75% higher resolution?
    1080 x 2280px vs 1080 x 1920px
  • 3.44x more megapixels (main camera)?
    48MP & 5MP & 2MP vs16MP
  • 12.31% bigger screen size?
    5.84″ vs 5.2″
  • 2x more megapixels (front camera)?
    16MP vs 8MP
  • 64GB more internal storage?
    128GB vs 64GB

Key differences in chart

BV 9800 ProCAT S61
PerformanceMediaTek Helio P60Snapdragon 630
Storage128 GB64 GB
Camera48 MP + 5 MP16 MP
Battery6580 mAh4500 mAh
Display6.3″ (16 cm)5.2″ (13.21 cm)
Ram6 GB4 GB
BV 9800 ProCAT S61
Front Camera16 MP8 MP
Battery6580 mAh4500 mAh
ProcessorMediaTek Helio P60Qualcomm Snapdragon 630
Display6.3 inches5.2 inches
Ram6 GB4 GB
Rear Camera48 MP + 5 MP16 MP
Other SensorsLight sensor, Proximity sensor, Accelerometer, CompassLight sensor, Proximity sensor, Accelerometer
Fingerprint Sensor PositionRear
Fingerprint SensorYes

General

BV 9800 ProCAT S61
Operating SystemAndroid v9.0 (Pie)Android v8.0 (Oreo)
Sim SlotsDual SIM, GSM+GSMDual SIM, GSM+GSM
ModelBV9800 ProS61
Launch DateJanuary 24, 2020 (Official)August 8, 2019 (Official)
BrandBlackviewCAT
Sim SizeSIM1: Nano
Network4G: Available (supports Indian bands), 3G: Available, 2G: Available4G: Available (doesn’t support Indian bands), 3G: Available, 2G: Available

Design & display – Blackview BV9800 Pro vs CAT S61

BV 9800 ProCAT S61
Display TypeIPS LCDIPS LCD
Aspect Ratio19.5:916:9
Bezelless DisplayYes  with waterdrop notch
Screen To Body Ratio Claimed By The Brand
85 %
Pixel Density409 ppi424 ppi
Screen To Body Ratio Calculated71.44 %68.32 %
Screen Size6.3 inches (16 cm)5.2 inches (13.21 cm)
Screen Resolution1080 x 2340 pixelsFull HD (1080 x 1920 pixels)
Touch ScreenYes Capacitive Touchscreen, Multi-touchYes  Capacitive Touchscreen, Multi-touch

The Blackview BV9800 Pro and the CAT S61 boast the most impressive design and build quality. Both phones boast excellent design and build quality and both have a super rugged body that is waterproof, drop-proof, and dustproof (IP68/IP69K/MIL-STD-810G certified). But when it comes to the display, the BV9800 Pro is a clear winner since it comes with a 6.3″ IPS FHD+ display with 19.5:9. On the other hand, the CAT S61 sports a smallish 5.2″ FHD IPS display with the classic 16:9 aspect ratio. The BV9800 Pro looks more fresh and modern thanks to its thin bezels and waterdrop notch while the CAT S61 looks like it came from the past (and it did).

BV 9800 ProCAT S61
Width81 mm73.4 mm
Weight322 grams163 grams
WaterproofWater resistant (up to 30 minutes in a depth of 1.5 meter), IP68, IP69KWater resistant (up to 60 minutes in a depth of 3 meter), IP68
Thickness14.8 mm7.9 mm
Height168 mm148.3 mm
ColoursBlack, Orange

Camera

Moving on to the optics found in both phones, the brand-new Blackview phone comes with Sony’s popular 48MP sensor with night shot mode support as a part of a triple camera setup. The camera setup also includes a FLIR® Lepton® thermal imaging sensor and a 5MP sensor assisting with thermal imaging, with an extra flash. Also, there is a 16MP front shooter. The CAT S61 is apparently weaker in this part as it sports a 16MP single rear camera with dual LED flash and an 8MP front shooter.

BV 9800 ProCAT S61
Camera SetupSingleSingle
SettingsExposure compensation, ISO controlExposure compensation, ISO control
Camera FeaturesDigital Zoom, Auto Flash, Face detection, Touch to focusDigital Zoom, Auto Flash, Face detection, Touch to focus
Image Resolution8000 x 6000 Pixels4616 x 3464 Pixels
SensorPureCelCMOS image sensor
AutofocusYesYes Phase Detection autofocus
Shooting ModesContinuos Shooting, High Dynamic Range mode (HDR)Continuos Shooting, High Dynamic Range mode (HDR)
Resolution16 MP f/2.0 Primary Camera8 MP Primary Camera
Physical ApertureF2.0
FlashYes LED FlashYes Dual LED Flash

Battery

Here things are even clearer, as BV9800 Pro houses an enormous 6580mAh battery with wireless charging support. That’s almost 47% bigger than the 4500mAh battery found in CAT S61. Both phones come with an 18W charger though.

Storage and memory

If the design and display aren’t your first priorities when buying a rugged phone, then hardware and software definitely are, especially if you consider the price tag. Blackview’s phone is powered by a MediaTek chipset while the CAT S61 is fueled by a Qualcomm chipset. MediaTek’s Helio P70 8-core SoC runs @2.0GHz coupled with 6GB of RAM and 128GB of storage and the S61 uses Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 8-core @2.2GHz backed by just 4GB of RAM and 64GB of storage. The BV9800 Pro comes with Android 9 Pie out-of-the-box while S61 runs on Android Oreo, with an update to Pie. With these specs in mind, the BV9800 Pro is a clear winner both in hardware and software.

Others

BV 9800 ProCAT S61
Battery User ReplaceableNoNo
Standby TimeUp to 840 Hours(2G)
TypeLi-PolymerLi-Polymer
Usb TypecYesYes
Wireless ChargingYes
Capacity6580 mAh4500 mAh
WifiWi-Fi 802.11, a/ac/b/g/nWi-Fi 802.11, b/g/n/n 5GHz
Wifi FeaturesMobile HotspotMobile Hotspot
Bluetoothv4.1v4.0
Usb ConnectivityMass storage device, USB charging
Network Support4G (supports Indian bands), 3G, 2G4G (doesn’t support Indian bands), 3G, 2G
Gpswith A-GPS, Glonass with A-GPS
Sim 14G Bands:TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41) / 2100(band 34) / 1900(band 39) FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 1900(band 2) / 1700(band 4) / 850(band 5) / 700(band 13) / 700(band 17) / 850(band 18) / 850(band 19) / 800(band 20) / 1900(band 25) / 850(band 26)3G Bands: UMTS 1900 / 2100 / 850 / 900 MHz2G Bands: GSM 1800 / 1900 / 850 / 900 MHz GPRS:Available EDGE:Available3G Bands: UMTS 2100 / 900 MHz2G Bands: GSM 1800 / 1900 / 850 / 900 MHz GPRS:Available EDGE:Available
Sim SizeSIM1: Nano
Sim 24G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41) / 2100(band 34) / 1900(band 39) FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 1900(band 2) / 1700(band 4) / 850(band 5) / 700(band 13) / 700(band 17) / 850(band 18) / 850(band 19) / 800(band 20) / 1900(band 25) / 850(band 26)3G Bands: UMTS 1900 / 2100 / 850 / 900 MHz 2G Bands: GSM 1800 / 1900 / 850 / 900 MHz GPRS:Available EDGE:Available2G Bands: GSM 1800 / 1900 / 850 / 900 MHz

Performance benchmark – Blackview BV9800 Pro vs CAT S61

Blackview BV9800 Pro

  • Geekbench: 301 (single core); 1447 (multi core); 1247 (compute)
  • PCMark (Work 2.0): 8068
  • Passmark: 9575
  • Passmark CPU: 161068
  • Androbench (sequential): 298.18 (sequential read); 243.53 (sequential write)
  • Androbench (random): 104.93 (random read); 21.58 (random write)
  • 3DMark Slingshot: 1401
  • 3DMark Slingshot Extreme: 1277
  • 3DMark IceStorm: 20019
  • HWBot Prime: 5913

CAT S61

  • Geekbench: 882 (single-core); 4,192 (multi-core); 3,760 (compute)
  • Antutu: 90,422
  • PCMark (Work 2.0): 4,831
  • Passmark: 5,808
  • Passmark CPU: 117,514
  • Androbench (sequential): 281 (sequential read); 213 (sequential write)
  • Androbench (random): 50 (random read); 15 (random write)
  • 3DMark Slingshot: 1322
  • 3DMark Slingshot Extreme: 822
  • 3DMark IceStorm: 17,018
  • HWBot Prime: 3,839

Editor’s recommendations